What VCs Actually Look for (From Someone Who's Been on Both Sides)

I've sat in the founder's chair, pitching investors with a deck I'd rehearsed 40 times, trying to read the room, wondering if the head nod meant interest or polite disengagement. I've also sat in the investor's chair, evaluating pitches, doing due diligence, and writing checks. The gap between what founders think matters in fundraising and what actually moves the needle is wider than most people realize.

This isn't the generic "have a great team and big TAM" advice you've read a hundred times. This is what I've learned from both sides of the table that nobody talks about openly.

The Deck Matters Less Than You Think

Founders spend weeks perfecting their pitch deck. The font, the animations, the TAM slide with the big circle. I get it — I did the same thing. But after seeing hundreds of pitches from both sides, I can tell you this: no investor has ever written a check because of a beautiful deck.

What investors actually remember is your ability to articulate the problem clearly and specifically. Not "communication is broken" — but "mid-market companies with 200 to 1,000 employees spend an average of $340,000 per year on tools that don't integrate, and the person who feels that pain most is the VP of Operations who loses 12 hours a week to manual data reconciliation."

Specificity signals that you understand the problem deeply. Vagueness signals that you're guessing. Every experienced investor can tell the difference within the first two minutes.

Revenue Trajectory Beats Revenue Amount

Founders obsess over hitting a specific revenue number before raising. "I need to get to $1M ARR before I approach Series A investors." That's not wrong, but it misses the point. Investors care far more about the trajectory and the efficiency than the absolute number.

A company at $600K ARR growing 20% month-over-month with strong unit economics is more fundable than a company at $1.5M ARR growing 5% month-over-month with negative contribution margins. The first company has momentum. The second company has a scaling problem.

When I evaluate a potential investment, I'm looking at the slope of the line, not the current point on the graph. I want to see that each cohort of customers is better than the last — better retention, higher ACV, shorter sales cycle. That pattern tells me the founder is learning and the product is improving.

The Reference Check You Don't Know About

Here's something most founders don't realize: the most important diligence happens when you're not in the room. Investors call your customers. They call people who evaluated your product and chose a competitor. They call former employees. They call other founders in your space.

I've passed on investments where the pitch was perfect but the back-channel references raised concerns. A customer who said the product was fine but the founder was impossible to work with. A former employee who described a toxic culture. A competitor who revealed that the "proprietary technology" was actually a fork of an open-source project.

Your reputation in the market is part of your fundraising strategy whether you manage it or not. Every interaction with a customer, employee, or partner is a potential reference check waiting to happen.

What "Founder-Market Fit" Really Means

Investors talk about founder-market fit a lot, and most founders misunderstand what it means. It's not about having a resume that matches your industry. It's about demonstrating an unfair insight into the problem you're solving.

The best founders I've invested in could teach me something about their market in the first ten minutes that I couldn't learn from reading industry reports. They had a perspective that could only come from living inside the problem — as a practitioner, a customer, or someone who'd been obsessing over this specific issue for years.

That depth of understanding gives investors confidence that you'll make good decisions when things get hard. And things always get hard. The question isn't whether you'll face an existential challenge — it's whether you'll have the contextual knowledge to navigate it.

The Question That Separates Great Founders

After hundreds of conversations with founders, one question consistently separates the ones I want to invest in from the ones I pass on: "What have you learned in the last six months that changed how you think about this business?"

Great founders have a specific, substantive answer. They can point to a customer conversation that shifted their roadmap, a metric that revealed a different bottleneck than they expected, a competitive move that forced them to rethink their positioning. They're actively learning and adapting.

The founders who struggle with this question — who give generic answers about "learning to be a better leader" or "understanding the importance of sales" — often lack the feedback loops that great operators build naturally. And without those feedback loops, they'll keep making the same mistakes at larger and larger scale.

The Honest Advice Nobody Gives

Not every company should raise venture capital. If you're building a profitable business that grows at 30% per year and gives you a great life, that is a legitimate and admirable path. VC money comes with expectations — specifically, the expectation of a 10x or greater return — that reshape every decision you make.

Before you start fundraising, ask yourself honestly: do I need this money to capture a time-sensitive opportunity, or do I want it because it feels like validation? The best fundraising conversations I've had were with founders who could clearly articulate why they needed capital now and what specifically they would do with it that they couldn't do otherwise.

If you're building a SaaS company and want a partner who's been in your shoes, let's talk. Book a call at cal.com/christopher-thierry/30min

---

Ready to accelerate your growth?

Book a 30-minute strategy call with Chris.

Book a Call →